LONDON RAPE CRISIS CENTRE

Statement from August 2001

London Rape Crisis Centre (LRCC) Management Board has had to take the difficult decision to temporarily close our helpline and counselling services.  Our staff are offering a 'sign posting' service, referring callers to alternative sources of advice, information and support.

The present Management Board has a long history of involvement with women's services, but we are fairly new to London Rape Crisis as an organisation.  We have inherited an agency which faces a number of serious difficulties, but which has 25 years experience in supporting women and girls who have experienced sexual violence, in public education, in research and in campaigning.  London was the first Rape Crisis Centre to open in Europe.

Our time over the last 6 months has been spent in resolving internal issues, focusing on why LRCC has reached such a critical state, and on planing for the future.

Problems with funding and problems with management have been the main contributors to LRCC's current position:

  • LRCC traditionally relied on core funding from London Borough Grants Committee.  When this funding was withdrawn in 1995, the Centre's income came mainly from fixed-term project specific funding, with a small amount of income from donations.
  • In common with many voluntary organisations, LRCC has had difficulty attracting and retaining Management Board members with the range of skills needed to help the organisation adapt to changing circumstances.  While past Management Board members have undoubtedly shared our commitment to the service, its aims and principles, there appear to have been deficits in strategic, financial and people management skills.
  • LRCC has not developed a longer term strategy, is isolated from other services, and has encountered the staffing difficulties with which all agencies working in a high-demand, high-stress areas will be familiar - in particular, long term stress-related sickness.
The Management Board remains committed to LRCC's aims and principles, and is acutely aware of the continued need for an independent sector women's service for London women who have experienced sexual violence.  LRCC is in the fortunate position of having substantial assets in the form of our building in central London.  Our intention is to sell the building and sue the funds to relocate and relaunch the service.  This will allow us to continue to use the bequest as intended, but to use it more effectively.  We are faced with a choice:
  • Do we restart LRCC's traditional pattern of services within its existing structure?
  • Do we close the Centre and put its assets in trust for a new or existing agency to provide rape crisis services for women and girls?
  • Do we take the opportunity to rethink how we can best meet our aims in the 21st century, with an open mind as to the pattern of services, and the organisational structures which are best placed to deliver?
However we proceed, we believe that any service needs to operate to the following core principles:
  • transparent and fair people management policies and procedures
  • clear accountabilities and expectations of Management Board, paid and unpaid workers
  • equality and diversity in employment and service delivery
  • a partnership approach to relationships with funders
  • consultation with all 'stakeholders' in the development of a clear longterm strategy
  • effective links and working relationships with other agencies
In addition, we believe that rape crisis services for women are most appropriately provided by women.

We want to widen the debate about the future of London Rape Crisis.  We are embarking on a programme of consultation with agencies that have an interest or expertise in work around sexual violence against women, seeking their views on what women need from London Rape Crisis, and the financial and structural opportunities available to us.  We are developing routes to consult London women directly. 

We will be holding an advisory meeting to feedback the results of this consultation process and to help us work through our options.

NB  the consultation process closed in December 2001.


Return to List of Notices