Since Fawcett does not have a view on the veil, we hosted this roundtable to provide a forum for a deeply critical and honest engagement with the apparent tensions between 'feminism' and 'Muslim women' in Britain.

At the event, participants were able to:

Engage each other directly
Explore opportunities for consensus
Suggest next steps in the effort to reclaim and reinvigorate feminism and work for positive change for all women

Key themes

There were six key themes in the discussion:

Power and discourses: Do we need to be more aware of the ways that political context, power imbalances, grassroots experiences and tone influence dominant discourses on the veil?
Choice: Should women have the right to choose to wear the veil in all situations?
Secularism: Where does the veil fit within a secular British culture? How do we reconcile religion and democracy?
The veil as a sign or symbol: The veil can signify meaning to others and signs can be powerful. What does the veil communicate in Britain?
Feminism: What is the 'feminist position' on the veil? How can feminists work in solidarity with women who wear the veil?
Policy recommendations: Nine ways that policy makers can meet the needs of Muslim women were suggested by participants. It is especially important to focus on: women's rights, gender equality, practical action from government to grassroots, and evidence rather than theory.

You can download a report of the debate as well as two presentations made at the event - all are in pdf format.

The veil debate: A report on Fawcett's roundtable on the veil, feminism and Muslim women.
Joan Smith's presentation: How the veil signifies inequality and challenges British secularism.
Maleiha Malik's presentation: Choice is essential to feminism, but choices are exercised within contexts.

… Return to the top of this page
… Retun to Index of Notices and Press Releases
… Return to home page